Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
14 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

Bjeff
A proposed 21% cut in the budget for international drug control could set back progress already achieved.

By JOHN P. WALTERS
You might have missed it, but on July 9 the White House quietly announced in a press release that cocaine use in the U.S. is down by over a third since 2006. This news comes on the heels of a major reduction in world-wide cocaine production, down 41% between 2001 and 2012 according to the Office of National Drug Control Policy. Cocaine-related deaths in the U.S. dropped 44% between 2006 and 2010. The rate of positive drug tests for cocaine declined even more steeply, down 65% between 2006 and mid-2012.

You do not have to have lived during the cocaine and crack epidemics of the 1980s and early 1990s to be grateful for this remarkable change. If you did, the progress seems miraculous. Unfortunately, the Obama administration is cutting the funds and undermining the political will that helped bring about this transformation.

Of all those who contributed to this striking success in the effort to control illegal drugs, two leaders deserve particular thanks: Alvaro Uribe, president of Colombia from 2002-10, and Felipe Calderón, president of Mexico from 2006-12.

President Uribe changed the future of Colombia by attacking the cocaine trade and violent groups on the left and right who used trafficking as a source of power. He brought the rule of law to large areas of his country where people had given up hope.

President Calderón made taking back Mexico from violent traffickers—narco-terrorists—the center of his administration. While cocaine trafficking is only a part of the cartels' criminal activity, Mr. Calderón stepped up attacks on cartel leaders; in January 2007 he even sent a planeload of his worst traffickers to justice in the United States. Because he had the courage to take on this difficult struggle, he began to see the power and violence of these criminal groups decline before he left office, as drug-related murders dropped 12% in the first five months of 2012.

Messrs. Uribe and Calderón created an unprecedented alliance with the U.S. to serve the interests of their homelands, but as in any true alliance all the partners were better for it. Democrats and Republicans stood up for these two leaders, giving critical enforcement, eradication, interdiction and adjudication support to their efforts. During their presidencies, Colombia and Mexico extradited hundreds of their worst traffickers to the U.S. to buy time for their developing judicial systems.

Recent events in Mexico indicate that enforcement successes there will be sustained. But Mr. Calderón has expressed frustration with the failure to reduce drug consumption in the U.S., and he has warned that unchecked demand could lead to drug legalization.

A 41% reduction in cocaine production, one might imagine, has something to do with a 44% reduction in cocaine overdoses. Yet the Obama administration is actually proposing to cut funding for international drug control to $1.5 billion for fiscal year 2014 from $1.9 billion in this fiscal year, a 21% reduction. In its July 9 press release, the White House tells us that it is time to spend an additional $1.4 billion to expand treatment and education, "the largest percentage increase in at least two decades."

Prevention and treatment are worthy activities, but the administration seems to have missed the point in its press release, which links the declines in cocaine use to reductions in supply. It offers no evidence that treatment and prevention played any role.

Most of all, President Obama's failure to push back against drug legalization in this country works against international anti-drug efforts. Raymond Yans, president of the International Narcotics Control Board, warned in March that allowing the implementation of legalization initiatives in Colorado and Washington "would be a violation of international law, namely the United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, to which the United States is a party." The U.S. is now undermining the foundation of the very achievement the administration just announced.

President Obama is as close to an icon for the young as any president has ever been. He and many of his generation used drugs and suffered for that use—a point he makes in his 1995 autobiography, "Dreams From My Father."

The president needs once again to speak honestly about the danger. If he sat with our children and spoke to them as if they were his daughters, he would be a powerful force for prevention. How about a single speech? Perhaps he could dedicate it to America's allies and the brave men and women who have given their lives to keep us safe.

Source:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324110404578629823790563466.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

TexcocoDeMora
Bjeff wrote

A 41% reduction in cocaine production, one might imagine, has something to do with a 44% reduction in cocaine overdoses. Yet the Obama administration is actually proposing to cut funding for international drug control to $1.5 billion for fiscal year 2014 from $1.9 billion in this fiscal year, a 21% reduction. In its July 9 press release, the White House tells us that it is time to spend an additional $1.4 billion to expand treatment and education, "the largest percentage increase in at least two decades."

Prevention and treatment are worthy activities, but the administration seems to have missed the point in its press release, which links the declines in cocaine use to reductions in supply. It offers no evidence that treatment and prevention played any role.
They better beef up fraud prevention, to many drug rehab frauds are happening right now as we speak.
http://narcconoticias.blogspot.com/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

Jorge Jorvanivich
In reply to this post by Bjeff
The main cause of the decline in cocaine use, and production...meth.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

Phineas
Yea kind of odd there's no mention of the huge increases in meth & heroin use......what a narrow scoped article

We WERE winning the drug war until our funding was cut to only $__ billion lol
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

Bjeff
In reply to this post by TexcocoDeMora
@Tex: That is interesting. Something I did not know about. Got any examples?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

Bjeff
In reply to this post by Jorge Jorvanivich
@Jorge&Phineas: That is not true. Meth use has declined significantly too.

Source:
http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/nationwide-trends

I believe this is what the government should focus on:
In 2011, an estimated 21.6 million Americans (8.4 percent) needed treatment for a problem related to drugs or alcohol, but only about 2.3 million people (less than 1 percent) received treatment at a specialty facility.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

Phineas
This is about heroin, but I know I've read articles fairly recently noting studies claiming the opposite to tje article posted ....i know for a.fact there are multiple new (or making comebacks) drug epidemics going on....
I guess it just depends on who wrote the article and what their agenda is...

 http://www.havocscope.com/increase-in-heroin-use-in-the-united-states/

 Here's a link analyzing THE SAME STUDY (that your article cites) explaining that heroin use has definitely increased (you're rigjt about the meth, according to this one study, but i personally don't think this info is very on point with what's going on - it's such a tough thing to accurately analyzr too.....

 http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Drug_Usage#sthash.jL81gZgE.dpbs

I think it's a load of self.serving bs in order to look like they're actually accomplishing something  (oh....and almost forgot the most important part .....so their "budget" doesn't get cut....

&u saying that harm reduction / treatmant have little to no effect (to curbing drug use) idk but to me it sounds very one sided....i do not think anyone EVEN CAN win /good stop tje dtug war no.matter how much $$$$ is thrown at it

These stats smell fishy to me (maybe cocaine use has decreased but id almost guaranty it's due to substitution not because they've "cut off the supply" lol

That worked great during the last prohibition didn't it?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

Phineas
Sorry from my phone....it likes to randomly add letters / symbols
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

Phineas
@bjeff - was not trying to say u were wrong or anything like that -to i appreciate the articles you (&a all the other regular contributors), it's just that from what I've seen, in my area, is that any and everything (coke/dope/meth/younameit) is much more available than it ever was in the past....it's also for the most part cheaper & purer.....heroin was unheard of here in the 90'searly 2000's but is now a major problem - the article just rubbed me the wrong way because what im seeing rt now in my area is no less than an epidemic and is very sad

So when i read this article touting how we've cut off tje supply & this is what we need more of......ive read a lot about hollands harm reduction policies &u feel our tax dollars would accomplish a lot more on the treatment / education side of things ......
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

Bjeff
In reply to this post by Phineas
Why the decrease in cocaine use? You know where all the Colombian blow is going:

AJ
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

AJ
In reply to this post by Bjeff

A proposal is just that, a proposal. That is all that Obama ever does, is make proposals. He won't do shit about the drug war because the war on drugs is a business. Too many people make money off of drugs and the government wants to control it. Pharmaceutical and the alcohol lobbyists also have their pesky lil' hands on the campaign to fight the 'War on drugs'.

Making drugs illegal also allows the U.S. government the means to attack criminals and place and keep them in prison. It also keeps minorities and the poor in prison where prison corporations have privatized the industry.

The entire origins of the drug war was a grassroots conservative attack on the minorities and the poor. The only drug that will be legalized in our time will be marijuana, and I'm okay with that. The beginning of any serious changes in the drug war will happen as soon as the Baby Boom generation dies off.
CHIVIS FOREVER
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

TexcocoDeMora
In reply to this post by Bjeff
Bjeff wrote
@Tex: That is interesting. Something I did not know about. Got any examples?
http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/29/health/rehab-racket-siu-cir-part-one/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

(CNN) -- Next to a smoke shop deep in the San Fernando Valley, employees at Able Family Support pull back the metal gates and open the doors to catch an unfettered flow of government money.
The clinic, reimbursed by taxpayers for each client it sees, offers in-person drug and alcohol counseling.
And Able Family is thriving, according to its billing records. In real life, on this hazy Southern California day, business moves at a slower pace.
No more than 30 people trickle into the rehab center until the doors are locked 10 hours later. Unbeknownst to clinic staff, reporters were stationed in parked cars counting the people who came and went on April 4.
The counting resumed a month later when the clinic submitted its bill to Los Angeles County seeking reimbursement -- not for 30 people, but for 179. The government promptly paid it -- $6,400 for clients Able Family reported it saw April 4.
 Troubled drug rehab clinics Troubled drug rehab clinics
In a rehab racket plagued by regulatory holes, paperwork trumps reality, a yearlong investigation by The Center for Investigative Reporting and CNN has found.
Thousands of pages of government records and dozens of interviews with counselors, patients and regulators reveal a widespread scheme to bilk the state's Medicaid system, the nation's largest. The populous Los Angeles region is one of the nation's top hot spots for health care fraud, and former state officials agree it is also ground zero for the rehab racket.
Drug Medi-Cal paid out $94 million in the past two fiscal years to 56 clinics in Southern California that have shown signs of deception or questionable billing practices, representing half of all public funding to the program, CIR and CNN found. Over the past six years, more than half a billion dollars have poured into the program statewide.
The simple stakeout on April 4 raises questions about the adequacy of government oversight of the program to help the poor and addicted, built on an honor system in which honor often is lacking. Oversight is marred by infrequent and cursory inspections and by a failure to act even when red flags appear.
Government officials who try to root out fraud clash with weak regulations, bureaucratic apathy and corruption in their own ranks. Once open, bad clinics rarely are shut down. CIR and CNN identified a dozen clinics caught cheating the system that not only remained in business, but also were rewarded with more public funds.
When told of the April 4 stakeout at Able Family, county regulators said they now have questions about whether the payments were legitimate. The findings merit a closer review but "look very incriminating," said a spokeswoman for Los Angeles County's substance abuse department. Able Family operates a small satellite clinic near downtown, the county noted -- but a security guard there said about 25 people came to that office each day.
The clinic's director, Alexander Ferdman, would not explain the discrepancy.
"I can't explain, because you will cut and paste and edit, and my answers will be to a totally different question," Ferdman said in a telephone interview, before hanging up.
CIR and CNN have exposed how clinics use coercion and forgery to defraud a taxpayer-funded program meant to help struggling addicts. The investigation also found that people ineligible to run Medi-Cal clinics did not just slip through the cracks -- they walked through doors regulators left wide open.
Some never should have been allowed in.

Alexander Ferdman was convicted in 2000 of engaging in organized crime in Texas. Despite a state law barring felons from running Medi-Cal clinics, California officials approved his drug rehab clinic in 2003. (Photo: CNN)
Felons are supposed to be blocked from running clinics. That didn't stop Ferdman. He entered the rehab racket two years after leaving a Texas prison, where he served time for orchestrating an organized crime scam. Over the course of a decade, he built his clinic into a $2 million-a-year operation -- all from taxpayer money.
Those on the Medicaid blacklist aren't allowed to bill for rehab funds. But George Ilouno did so repeatedly. Convicted of defrauding the student loan program, Ilouno was barred from collecting a single Medicaid dollar. Still, the state and county paid him more than a million.
Clients who went to GB Medical Services in Long Beach and counselors who worked there described years of graft. Ilouno and his staff bribed clients to show up, they claimed. Counselors fabricated therapy sessions that never took place.
One counselor told state investigators that such fraud was "rampant from Long Beach to Los Angeles," crediting the scammers' "success to the incompetence of the ... auditors," an arrest declaration says.
Federal Medicaid authorities place responsibility for safeguarding taxpayer dollars squarely with California's Department of Health Care Services. And a year after CIR filed its first public records request about Drug Medi-Cal fraud, the department moved earlier this month to temporarily cut funding to 16 rehab clinics.
But according to interviews with former state officials, the department has fielded concerns about rehab clinic fraud for at least five years yet has done almost nothing to combat it.

"Everyone talked the talk, everyone was zero tolerance for fraud and abuse, but nobody would do anything about it," said Joy Jarfors, a manager with the California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs until 2010. (Photo: CNN)
"Everyone talked the talk, everyone was zero tolerance for fraud and abuse, but no one would do anything about it," said Joy Jarfors, who retired in 2010 from a manager position at the Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, which shared the job of clinic oversight until last July.
Responsibility for policing Drug Medi-Cal is split. The state certifies the clinics, but counties handle the money and shoulder the financial risk when mistakes are made. Both county and state analysts audit the clinics annually.
To many inside government and out, it has not been clear who's in charge. In that vacuum, fraud has thrived.
The alcohol and drug department this month merged with the Department of Health Care Services. Diana Dooley, secretary of the governor's Health and Human Services Agency, has overseen both departments since December 2010 but declined to give a sit-down interview about what went wrong.
In a statement announcing the temporary suspensions, Department of Health Care Services Director Toby Douglas said the 16 clinic sites have been referred to the state's Department of Justice. On Wednesday, the health department's chief deputy director, Karen Johnson, said her staff also would be "fanning out statewide to review every rehab facility."
Douglas' deputy in charge of audits and investigations, Bruce Lim, said the action was spurred by media inquiries, one of many ways regulators identify problems. Investigators are reviewing issues raised by CIR and CNN, including questions about clinics with felons at the helm, he added.
"That's a top priority for us and a concern," Lim said.
Lim, who has been the investigations chief for three years, said he could not identify the clinics or address criticism that his department has long ignored the problem.
California rehab by the numbers
"I can't speak for the past," he said.
Past fraud conviction
On September 29, 2003, a state alcohol and drug program analyst arrived at a busy Panorama City strip mall to certify the state's newest Drug Medi-Cal clinic, Able Family Support.
Karen Morrison scrutinized the governing body's meeting schedule and reviewed staff résumés. Records from the visit offer no hint that she asked -- or knew -- about the criminal record of the man who greeted her.
Morrison, now a real estate agent, said she does not recall the visit or a provider with a felony history.
But Alexander Ferdman was on parole at the time, having served one year of a seven-year sentence for engaging in organized crime.
Prosecutors in Texas had pegged Ferdman as the ringleader of a scam that robbed auto insurers of millions. An indictment from the Travis County district attorney's office says a team of fixers staged crashes and recruited actual crash victims as pawns to generate fake legal and medical bills.
One witness described Ferdman as the man who paid off operatives from a briefcase full of cash.
Although the state can grant special exceptions for felons to be Medi-Cal providers, it doesn't appear that regulators did so for Ferdman. When he moved to California to open a rehab clinic, nothing in state records indicated that regulators knew about Ferdman's organized crime conviction.
A standard form in 2003 asked about clinic leaders' convictions, but missed the mark, inquiring only about fraud against the government. Ferdman defrauded private insurers. And by late 2011, when Ferdman was asked in a routine disclosure form whether he had been convicted in the last 10 years, he could honestly respond "no."
Ferdman told reporters that he accepted a plea agreement in the Texas case because he was facing "99 years." He denied any wrongdoing.
"There was no fraud, and there was no record of it in any way," Ferdman said. "It's a very long story."
Soon after the state cleared his rehab center to open in 2003, Ferdman made some questionable spending decisions.
A state review of the center's 2004 budget revealed that public funds intended to help low-income addicts covered $10,000 in gifts and travel, including $605 spent at a Palm Springs spa resort, a $586 crab feast, $108 for flowers and a Betty Boop souvenir.
In his written response to state auditors, Ferdman defended the spending as "business purchases" necessary for "promoting and outreach" for the clinic.
Taxpayers also spent $2,000 a month on car expenses for Ferdman and Able Family's co-founder, Leonid Aksert. Ferdman told auditors that the travel stipend was approved by the center's board of directors. State records show that the five-member board included Ferdman, Aksert and their wives.
State auditors asked Los Angeles County to repay the state $68,000 provided to Able Family in 2004. Ultimately, Able Family repaid half of the money the state wanted back.
That wouldn't be the last time Ferdman and Able Family came to the attention of auditors.
Medical license denied, clinic approved
Rebecca Lira was disgusted in 2001 as she watched fraud seep into the rehab system she had helped build two decades before. "I really wanted to close all of them down, bust all of them, if you will," she said.
A deputy director with the state Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, Lira decided to confront the problem by grilling people who applied to launch new clinics.
She said she called applicants and quizzed them about their treatment philosophy. Many hung up and called back in a half-hour with answers. Others just hung up. "Those are the fly-by-nights -- those are the programs that are, in my opinion ... abusing the system," Lira said.
One of the providers she questioned was the program director at GB Medical Services, George Ilouno. Lira concluded that he had "no clue," records show.
Ilouno's problems ran much deeper than limited knowledge of addiction treatment.
State medical regulators had blocked Ilouno from becoming a physician's assistant in 2001, noting that he had been convicted of lying on student loan applications. The medical board concluded that Ilouno's "multiple acts of wrongdoing demonstrated an ongoing pattern of fraud."
As a result, the inspector general for the federal Health and Human Services Department put Ilouno on its blacklist, preventing him from billing Medicaid. State Medi-Cal authorities added him to their banned list as well.
Lira's staff vetted GB Medical Services after Ilouno and his wife, Benedicta, co-founded GB Medical in June 2006. Required paperwork filed two months later asked directly: Were any of GB Medical's owners suspended from billing Medicaid or convicted of misdemeanor government fraud?
Benedicta Ilouno indicated she was the sole owner and had a clean record.
Lira's staff, busy asking the couple for staff résumés and a detailed budget, had documents detailing George Ilouno's co-founder role. But there is no record that they followed up.
By late 2007, the Ilounos were in business, according to a letter signed by Lira staffer Allen Scott, a licensing and certification supervisor. Former staff members say George Ilouno ran day-to-day operations.
And, they say, the rehab clinic was scamming from the start.
Counselor Art Hill filed a complaint with state regulators in 2008 charging that staff paid young women $30 to $40 to sign papers saying they were getting drug counseling at GB Medical.
Hill's concerns eventually would be validated after his complaint touched off a criminal probe that led to pleas of no contest by three employees this year. But back in 2008, a state alcohol and drug program investigator deemed his claims unsubstantiated after interviewing staff and clients.
The addict-turned-counselor told CIR that clients spoke openly during his group therapy sessions about being paid to attend. Hill included their comments in his write-ups on the sessions, but he said George Ilouno ordered him to substitute made-up tales of addicts striving to get sober.
One time, Hill said, Ilouno asked him to giftwrap bottles of alcohol, including Hennessy cognac, for the rehab patients. Hill said he won't work in Drug Medi-Cal again after seeing clients exploited.
"As far as staying sober or trying to be clean," he said, "the program is not helping them."
On behalf of Ilouno, Malibu criminal defense attorney Robert Helfend denied that rehab clients were given alcohol or that session notes were changed. He did not address the claim that clients were paid, but denied that "clients demanded rising sums of money or financial favors."
Kanisha Dickerson insists she and four of her teenage children each received at least $5 whenever they attended counseling sessions at GB Medical in 2008. Ilouno would sometimes call her into his office and pay her himself, she said.

Darshaye Miles, 19, says she and others were paid $5 to attend drug counseling sessions at GB Medical Services in Long Beach, California. (Photo: CNN)
Her daughter, Darshaye Miles, 19, said she bought marijuana with the $5 she earned going to rehab. Little counseling or guidance was offered, she said, even to people who needed it.
"I really want the world to hear the story about these alcohol programs because I think that they just scam," Miles said. "They (are) just doing it to get their money."
The state's probe of GB Medical continued for half a decade, while more than $1 million in Medi-Cal funds went to the operation. In that timeframe, at least 15 state and county officials signed off on certifications, reviews and funding increases.
Once the state Department of Justice launched a formal investigation in 2008, authorities could have followed a state law calling on them to suspend Ilouno's Drug Medi-Cal operation. But they didn't.
Even after a Department of Justice investigator served Los Angeles County with a court order for the clinic's financial records in 2010, the county gave GB Medical a $90,000 annual raise. Its taxpayer funding reached $440,000 last year.
John Viernes Jr., director of Substance Abuse Prevention and Control in Los Angeles County, said he approved the raise after a Department of Justice agent said the investigation was on a back burner and might be closed.
Viernes also said he took into account the fact that his auditors didn't find anything incriminating in their own annual review.
This March, Ilouno was charged with Medi-Cal fraud, grand theft and giving kickbacks. Three counselors were charged with fraud and grand theft; a clinic driver was charged with paying kickbacks. The arrest declaration included an analysis of billing records for the fiscal year ending in 2010, which found $64,400 had been obtained fraudulently.
Ilouno has pleaded not guilty. His attorney, Helfend, said in a letter to CIR that counselors acted without GB Medical's knowledge or consent. GB Medical, he added, is prepared to work on a repayment plan, if that becomes necessary.
Of the counselors charged, two pleaded no contest to felony Medi-Cal fraud. The driver pleaded no contest to a misdemeanor charge of paying kickbacks, and the fourth staff member has not yet entered a plea.
After Ilouno's arrest, GB Medical remained open and continued collecting public funds. Its billing slowed dramatically, though, with three clients one day and five the next.
Asked why funding had continued, Los Angeles County spokeswoman Lydia Becerra said her department was unaware that Ilouno had been arrested.
Approached by reporters in the parking lot of his Long Beach clinic in April, Ilouno declined to comment and hopped in his Mercedes, his tires squealing as he sped away. In July, a sign posted on GB Medical's door said the clinic no longer provides Drug Medi-Cal services.
Difficulty policing fraud
Around the time the state alcohol and drug department cleared GB Medical to operate, the only full-time investigator on the department's team was growing disillusioned.
That was in 2008, a turning point in state oversight. Soon, the larger Department of Health Care Services would gain more control through an unusual series of events, but it would wait years -- until earlier this month -- to initiate major changes.
Drug and alcohol investigator Lorna Flores recalls turning down bribes from clinics even as she tried to clean up the program.
"I speculated that we were seeing the tip of an iceberg," said Flores, who today works in the private rehab sector with her former boss, Rebecca Lira. "At that time, I would have said 50 percent of the programs out there are potentially fraudulent in L.A. County."
Flores left state service soon after Lira, in 2008, disheartened that she could not seem to solve the problem.
Then, things took a strange turn.
Gary Goethe assumed control of the small Drug Medi-Cal investigations unit. In 2009, the FBI arrested him on charges of extorting cash from a clinic owner. Goethe pleaded guilty but characterizes his actions as trying to root out fraud through an overzealous sting.
"I was really trying to elicit wrongdoing from providers," Goethe said in an interview. "I was left out to dry by myself, with no support from the department on my fraud efforts."
Karen Johnson, the chief deputy director of the Department of Health Care Services, said Goethe's arrest undermined investigative efforts.
After Goethe's arrest, a state drug and alcohol official ordered staff to stop passing cases of suspected fraud directly to criminal investigators. Instead, cases would be referred to health services, which would decide whether to refer them to law enforcement.
Jarfors, then the Drug Medi-Cal supervisor, said the edict pushed her staff too far from the action of prosecuting fraud.
Little had come out of monthly anti-fraud meetings led by investigation leaders in the Department of Health Care Services, Jarfors claimed. "We practically stood on tables just screaming, we brought it up at every opportunity that we could, and nothing would be done," she said.
Daniel Steinhart, Jarfors' boss, agreed that the anti-fraud meetings were all talk and no action. And he said he knows his order to shift decision-making to the Department of Health Care Services disappointed his staff. They believed the larger department viewed rehab clinic cases as minor compared with other health scams.
"The general belief was (the rehab cases) were small potatoes -- they weren't interested," Steinhart said.
Funding hard to cut off
The head of L.A. County's substance abuse department for five years is at once part of the problem and part of the solution.
John Viernes has worked with other county substance abuse leaders to point out flaws in the Drug Medi-Cal counseling program and has advocated for other styles of treatment proven to turn around lives.
But he's also signed off on raises for providers repeatedly accused of cheating or caught in deceptive billing practices.
Viernes says he has little choice.
The state allows almost anyone to open a clinic, he said. And once it's running, owners are entitled to public funding for as many patients as they sign up under a 1994 court ruling, Sobky v. Smoley, which establishes Medi-Cal patients' right to drug treatment. The county, according to Viernes, is obligated to contract with state-certified clinics and sign off on their funding.
"This program is just not well run," Viernes said of state oversight.
Viernes' deputy Michael Kerr supervises a staff of seven "contract monitors" who inspect 120 counseling clinics annually, plus 20 more methadone clinics. Each clinic may have one or more sites; some have more than a dozen.
Around the state, Drug Medi-Cal clinics submit bills and regularly receive payment from the counties within weeks. State and county auditors discover taxpayer money has been squandered only if they later review the clinics' client charts.
The county's enforcement vigor has waned considerably in recent years. Viernes signed off on a blitz of nine contract terminations in 2009, shutting down one Wilshire Boulevard clinic that paid two clients $20 each to sign admission paperwork used to generate $11,000 in bills for phantom care.
His team cut off another pair of clinics -- in Los Angeles and Compton -- caught billing for the same clients' care at the same time, eight miles apart.
Even as complaints and evidence of cheating piled up, the county pulled back -- and closed no clinics this year. Viernes said officials have shifted toward helping clinics improve when they fail to meet standards.
The state alcohol and drug department has suspended or terminated certification for at least three clinics since 2009, under a state law that calls for such action during a fraud probe. The Department of Health Care Services declined to identify any cases in which it had cut off a clinic until its crackdown in July.
Funding still flows
Seven years after Alexander Ferdman had his Palm Springs spending spree, auditors in L.A. County began to question whether some of the counseling sessions at his clinic actually took place.
Able Family billed for a group therapy session held on a Sunday when the counseling center was closed, according to a July 2011 county billing review. The 10 a.m. on-site review also turned up notes recounting results of a group therapy session that had not yet been held.

Despite having funds at Able Family Support docked by regulators twice, for a Palm Springs spending spree and fraudulent billing, Alexander Ferdman continued to draw increasing amounts of taxpayer money -- up to $2 million this year. (Photo: CNN)
County auditors issued a report warning Ferdman that the county considers such findings evidence of "fraudulent practices" and that the clinic could lose its contract. The county ultimately docked him $7,000.
And then the funding boosts came. Viernes approved an increase in Able Family's funding from $1.6 million in 2011 to nearly $2 million in 2013. Kerr, the county's Drug Medi-Cal supervisor, said such funding increases are approved routinely if clinics fix problems cited in audits.
When reporters laid out the results of their April 2013 stakeout to county regulators, officials pledged to follow up. County auditors went out to dig through paperwork at the clinic last week, only to find Able Family closed.
The clinic's medical director, Dr. Howard Oliver, told CNN that Able Family had been suspended by the state -- a month after reporters confronted California's top health official about Ferdman's record and after the county was notified about the stakeout results.
The doctor praised Ferdman, saying he was helping people and "I've never seen him do anything wrong."
Back in Texas, defense attorney Barrett Hansen was bemused to learn of Ferdman's 10-year career in government contracting. Hansen worked as a prosecutor on Ferdman's insurance fraud case.
"If the state of California is willing to throw money at him," she said, "he's willing to catch it."
http://narcconoticias.blogspot.com/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

Bjeff
In reply to this post by Phineas
@Phineas: I think we agree with one another. The decrease in cocaine use has more to do with trends and popularity and what they mix cocaine with these days than cutting off supply. Who wants a tissue disease and a nose looking like Michael Jackson? Cocaine went out the door with Donna Summer.

I know that drug use is seen as an epidemic in many areas. Expensive Oxy being replaced by 9 dollar heroin. I think it looks that way because it mostly affects the younger generation, and that makes it more visible. However, nationwide, heroin users have increased from 100.000 to 300.000 addicts over the last decade. While cocaine users have decreased from 2.4 million to 1.4 million and meth users from 700.000 to 400.000 since 2006. I don't buy the argument that one drug has simply replaced another.

I definitely agree that focus should be placed on treatment, and I think drugs should be legal to undermine organized crime.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Obama Signals Retreat in the War on Drugs

Bjeff
In reply to this post by TexcocoDeMora
@Tex: Thanks. They surely are elaborate schemers. There seems to be a lack of control and lax laws.