I changed the title of this thread at the suggestion of Chivo. It was originally posted as "Do we have any mathmaticians or statisticians on the Forum?" Since no one came forward claiming to be a math expert, I am including some material from the site linked below that even I can understand.

The site shows what purports to be screen captures or the IFE computers during the counting process that show voter counts that are not the same as was being reported. Here are the results of what the screen captures show;

2:37 AM Monday EPN 12,204,812 / AMLO 19,051,043 / with 60% of the vote counted.

10:35 am, Monday July 2 EPN 14,517,718 / 31.87% / AMLO 17,742,852 / 37.87% / 91.77% Votes captured.

20:30, Monday July 2 EPN 15,727,398 - 31.15% / AMLO 18,535,117 - 38.64% / 98.95% Votes captured

The above is the purported screen capture of the IFE computer screen at 10:35 am Monday, July 2 with 91% of the vote counted. The other screens showing the other results above can viewed on the link.

The math questions come up in a presentation that a professor of physics at the University of Texas that is included on the site;

"The PREP is rigged, says Professor of Physics at the University of Texas at El Paso, Jorge Lopez Garcia (@ J_LopezGallardo).

According to Lopez Garcia, the PREP shows perfect correlations in 41 p data maintained PREPfor 3 hours, which, he says, is indicatorio fraud.

"The numbers are manipulated, as well as 4.7% was set constant for quadri + + Noreg null," says the mathematician.

Lopez Garcia posted on his Twitter account a graph indicating that the correlation of the results of the PREP has been perfect for hours, which should not be possible.

Rarely do we make exceptions for "the people has the government it deserves", but in this election 2012 we have four certainties: 1 - Mexico participated and voted in greater

FRAUDULENT ALGORITHMS

The "algorithm fraudulent" is reflected in the fact that the numerical growth in the graph of both candidates, can not be identical, why? -The PREP is not the territory: The regions of the electorate are not all simultaneously-positive or negative for both candidates:-That you involve in the graph, the lines of both candidates should have different measures, "teeth" because of the arrest warrant data and preferences of each region. The numeratis recorded these patterns "parallel"-that deviate from the real-, as a result of fraud programming. (algorithm): The two lines, the green and yellow, if they reflected real numbers, they could not grow as a mirror. The mathematical impossibility shows digital fraud.

A quick count is a statistical procedure that seeks to obtain a preliminary estimate of the outcome of the election on the day of the vote. Made with official information obtained in the tally sheets and tally released after the vote. "-Interestingly, numbers of IFE are other way around as was predicted by the doctor in Applied Mathematics from the University of Minnesota Ortigoza Gerardo Mario Capetillo, a professor at the Universidad Veracruzana and level one in the National System of Researchers predicted the victory of Andres Manuel Lopez. with 37.96 percent, followed by Enrique Peña Nieto with 30.7 percent.

TRIUMPH OF MATHEMATICAL FORECAST BY 7 POINTS ON AMLO Peña Nieto.

http://misteriospublicos.blogspot.mx/2012/06/matematico-pronostica-triunfo-de-amlo.html.

Maybe Obregon is not crazy after all. I don't know if the screen captures and data presented on the site are legitimate or not, but I think it deserves a serious investigation.

The following is the original post that I posted yesterday.

GameDog posted an interesting reply to Siskiyou_Kid's post "The Dinosaur is Back". He made a comment that I loved about all the Soriana stores all over Mexico being full of shoppers trying to cash in their PRI credit or debit cards.

He then posted a link to a site (a blog) that was reporting on "Anonymous" hacking into IFE computers and the results not being the same as what they were reporting. It then goes on in great detail about some mathematical formulas which allegedly show the election results could not be valid. I muddled through the Spanish somewhat, but no way I could follow all they were trying to show on the supposedly mathematical laws and graphs.

Anyone on board here that can understand it?

The link which GameDog reference is

http://teatrodelamente.wordpress.com/2012/07/02/anonymous-hackea-al-ife-todo-sea-por-la-democracia-2/The linked site is Teatrodelamente’s Blog. It also has a link to a story about a coordinator of AMLO's campaign being killed in Juarez, N.L.. It is dated today.

DD

Words are powerful weapons, be careful how you use them.